Resourceship: An Austrian theory of mineral resources
نویسندگان
چکیده
Economists inside and outside of the Austrian-school tradition have formulated a subjectivist theory of mineral resources. While von Mises (1940) presented a rudimentary theory, institutionalist Zimmermann (1933 and after) provided an indepth mind-centered approach distinct from the objective, neoclassical theory for minerals developed by Jevons (1865, 1866), Gray (1913), and Hotelling (1931). A full-fledged Austrian theory identifies the fixity/depletionism view of minerals as incompatible with entrepreneurship. Mineral resourceship, praxeologically akin to manufacturing, or the making of capital goods, demotes the distinction between depletable and nondepletable resources for the sciences of human action. Instead of nonreproducibility, the interplay of geography and institutions becomes the locus of mineral-resource theory, given the nonuniform distribution of deposits. An Austrianinstitutional theory is more robust for explaining changes in mineral-resource scarcity than neoclassical depletionism, and offers a wide research agenda for current debates over resource production, usage, and future availability.
منابع مشابه
Austrian Economics and Game Theory: A Stocktaking and an Evaluation
I discuss the merits and drawbacks of game theory in economics from the perspective of Austrian economics. I begin by arguing that Austrians have neglected game theory at their peril, and then suggest that game theoretic reasoning could be one way of modelling key Austrian insights. However, admittedly some aspects of game theory don’t square easily with Austrian economics. Moreover, a major st...
متن کاملAnalogous Models of Complexity: The Austrian Theory of Capital and Hayek’s Theory of Cognition as Adaptive Classifying Systems
When understood as an inevitable inconsistency of individual plans,disequilibrium is not only a necessary condition for the existence, and hence understanding, of the market process as we know it, it is also theglue connecting three other "Austrian" themes. In equilibrium hetero geneity of resources would have no strategic significance, specific andprivate knowledge would be much l...
متن کاملTowards an Austrian Theory of the Firm ∗
T he Austrian school faces a true ambiguity concerning its ability to develop a positive theory of the firm. Although it never really forms the subject of specific studies, the enterprise nevertheless implicitly appears both in Austrian theories of entrepreneurship—which deal with the market behavior of enterprises facing the problem of knowledge—and in their writings on the microeconomic analy...
متن کاملFirms, Strategies, and Resources: Contributions from Austrian Economics
Recently, scholars working in the field of modern Austrian economics have wondered about what this literature might offer for an understanding of the nature of modern business organizations (for example, Foss 1994, 1997b; Sautet 1998; Mathews 1998). In this article, we examine the received literature on firms and strategies and find that Austrian economics has important contributions to make in...
متن کاملAn Algorithm Based on Theory of Constraints and Branch and Bound for Solving Integrated Product-Mix-Outsourcing Problem
One of the most important decision making problems in many production systems is identification and determination of products and their quantities according to available resources. This problem is called product-mix. However, in the real-world situations, for existing constrained resources, many companies try to provide some products from external resources to achieve more profits. In this pape...
متن کامل